Nevada Question 3 (2008)
From Ballotpedia
Contents |
Question 3 on Nevada's November 2008 ballot was passed as Assembly Joint Resolution No. 16 of the 73rd Legislative Session and sent appeared on the November 2008 ballot. This measure was a legislatively-referred constitutional amendment.
2008 election results
These election results are based on the Nevada Elections Division.[1]
| Question 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes or no | Votes | Percentage | ||
 Yes
| 518,733 | 60.13% | ||
| No | 344,017 | 39.87% | ||
| Total votes | 862,750 | 100% | ||
Background
Currently, there is no constitutional or statutory language establishing specific provisions the Legislature must consider when granting an exemption from property tax or sales and use tax, nor is the Legislature required to include a specific expiration date for an exemption.
Specific Provisions
The measure enacted the following provisions:
- Require the state legislature to determine the social and economic purpose and benefits of any exemptions from property taxes or sales taxes before enacting such exemptions.
- Require that such exemptions come with specific expiration dates and that similar classes of taxpayers be required to meet similar requirements for qualifying for the exemptions
The official ballot question for the measure reads:
Shall the Nevada Constitution be amended to require that, before it can enact an exemption from property tax or from sales and use tax, the Nevada Legislature must: (1) make certain findings regarding the social or economic purpose and benefits of the exemption; (2) ensure that similar classes of taxpayers must meet similar requirements for claiming exemptions; and (3) provide a specific date on which the exemption will expire?
Supporters
Arguments in Support
Notable arguments made in support of the measure included:
- When a particular group of taxpayers is given the benefit of an exemption, the legislature should be required to give just cause for such an exemption.
- There is no constitutional or statutory language establishing specific provisions the Legislature must consider when granting an exemption from property tax or sales and use tax, nor is the Legislature required to include a specific expiration date for an exemption. Supporters say this measure would rectify that situation.
- Requiring a sunset provision on exemptions will help ensure that exemptions do not outlive their usefulness or reduce revenues unnecessarily.
Opponents
Editorial Opponents:
- The Las Vegas Sun[2]
Arguments in Opposition
Notable arguments made in opposition to the measure included:
- The proposed amendment assumes that the legislature does not consider whether a proposed property or sales and use tax exemption provides a bona fide social or economic purpose or whether the benefits of the exemption will exceed its costs.
- This amendment does not establish standards for making such determinations, so this amendment may have no effect at all.
- Requiring the Legislature to set a date for expiration of the exemptions may still allow them to be active for a very long time. Prior Legislatures have established sunset dates when enacting property tax or sales and use tax exemptions.
- There is no need to clutter the Constitution with this measure.
Status
This measure was placed on the November 2008 ballot by the state legislature.
See also
- Procedures for qualifying an initiative in Nevada
- Laws governing the initiative process in Nevada
- Nevada 2008 ballot measures
External links
References
- ↑ Nevada Election Division, 2008 Election Results
- ↑ Las Vegas Sun: "Ballot question decisions," October 18, 2008
