Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association
HJTA logo social media.jpg
Basic facts
Location:Sacramento and Los Angeles, California
Type:501(c)(4)
Top official:Jon Coupal
Founder(s):Howard Jarvis and Estelle Jarvis
Year founded:1978
Website:Official website

The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association (HJTA) is a 501(c)(4) organization based in Sacramento and Los Angeles, California, that aims to defend Proposition 13 (1978), oppose certain tax increases, and support laws requiring voter approval of tax increases.[1]

  • HJTA was founded after Howard Jarvis' Proposition 13 was approved in 1978.
  • HJTA opposed the California Tax on Commercial and Industrial Properties for Education and Local Government Funding Initiative, which would amend Proposition 13 to tax commercial and industrial properties based on market value.
  • HJTA took a stance on 39 ballot measures from 1982 to 2002.
  • Background

    See also: California Proposition 13, Tax Limitations Initiative (June 1978)

    Howard Jarvis and Estelle Jarvis founded HJTA as the California Tax Reduction Movement (CTRA) in 1978. According to HJTA, Howard and Estelle Jarvis founded the organization to "protect Proposition 13 and to continue the movement against higher taxes."[1]

    Voters approved Proposition 13 in 1978. The amendment limited increases to the tax-assessed value of properties and required a two-thirds vote for legislative bodies to increase taxes. Howard Jarvis was involved in developing Proposition 13. The ballot measure was the beginning of a period in state politics often referred to as the tax revolt.[2][3][4] Joel Fox, former HJTA president and editor of Fox & Hounds, described Proposition 13 as the "Holy Grail of the tax revolt."[5]

    After Howard Jarvis died in 1986, Joel Fox incorporated the CTRA as the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association (HJTA). Fox served as HJTA's first president from 1986 to 1998.[6] Jon Coupal, who served as HJTA's Director of Legal Affairs from 1991 to 1998, became president of the organization in 1999.[7]

    According the HJTA's website, the organization's mission statement is, "The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association is dedicated to the protection of Proposition 13 and the advancement of taxpayers’ rights, including the right to limited taxation, the right to vote on tax increases and the right of economical, equitable and efficient use of taxpayer dollars."[8]

    Leadership

    Below is a list of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association leadership as of 2024:[9]

    • Jonathan Coupal, President
    • Erin Michael Dolan, CFO
    • Craig Mordoh, Secretary
    • Susan Shelley, Vice President - Communications
    • Scott Kaufman, Legal Director
    • William Kelso, Director
    • James Nielsen, Director
    • Gloria Phillips, Director

    Work and activities

    Electoral activities and influence

    The following table details HJTA's ballot measure stances available on Ballotpedia:

    Ballot measure support and opposition for HJTA
    Ballot measure Year Position Status
    California Pandemic Early Detection and Prevention Institute Initiative 2024 Opposed Not on the ballot
    California Proposition 1, Behavioral Health Services Program and Bond Measure 2024 Opposed  Approveda Approved
    California Proposition 2, Public Education Facilities Bond Measure 2024 Opposed  Approveda Approved
    California Proposition 4, Parks, Environment, Energy, and Water Bond Measure 2024 Opposed  Approveda Approved
    California Proposition 5, Lower Supermajority Requirement to 55% for Local Bond Measures to Fund Housing and Public Infrastructure Amendment 2024 Opposed  Defeatedd
    California Proposition 6, Remove Involuntary Servitude as Punishment for Crime Amendment 2024 Opposed  Defeatedd
    Los Angeles, California, Proposition ULA, Tax on $5 Million House Sales Initiative 2022 Opposed  Approveda Approved
    California Proposition 30, Tax on Income Above $2 Million for Zero-Emissions Vehicles and Wildfire Prevention Initiative 2022 Opposed  Defeatedd Defeated
    California Proposition 15: Tax on Commercial and Industrial Properties for Education and Local Government Funding Initiative 2020 Opposed[10]  Defeatedd Defeated
    California Proposition 13: School and College Facilities Bond 2020 Opposed[11]  Defeatedd Defeated
    California Proposition 6: Voter Approval for Future Gas and Vehicle Taxes and 2017 Tax Repeal 2018 Supported  Defeatedd Defeated
    California Proposition 10: Local Rent Control 2018 Opposed  Defeatedd Defeated
    California Proposition 68: Parks, Environment, and Water Bond 2018 Opposed  Approveda Approved
    California Proposition 53: Voter Approval Requirement for Revenue Bonds Above $2 Billion 2016 Supported  Defeatedd Defeated
    California Proposition 54: Public Display of Legislative Bills Prior to Vote 2016 Supported  Approveda Approved
    California Proposition 55: Extension of the Proposition 30 Income Tax Increase 2016 Opposed  Approveda Approved
    California Proposition 56: Tobacco Tax Increase 2016 Opposed  Approveda Approved
    California Proposition 67: Plastic Bag Ban 2016 Opposed  Approveda Approved
    California Proposition 2: Rainy Day Budget Stabilization Fund 2014 Supported  Approveda Approved
    California Proposition 42: Compliance of Local Agencies with Public Records 2014 Supported  Approveda Approved
    California Proposition 46: Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Cap and Drug Testing of Doctors 2014 Opposed  Defeatedd Defeated
    California Proposition 29: Tobacco Tax for Cancer Research 2012 Opposed  Defeatedd Defeated
    California Proposition 30: Sales and Income Tax Increase 2012 Opposed  Approveda Approved
    California Proposition 32: Prohibit Automatic Deductions Used for Politics 2012 Supported  Defeatedd Defeated
    California Proposition 38: State Income Tax Increase for Education 2012 Opposed  Defeatedd Defeated
    California Proposition 21: Vehicle License Fee for Parks 2010 Opposed  Defeatedd Defeated
    California Proposition 23: Suspension of AB 32 (Renewable Portfolio Standard) 2010 Supported  Defeatedd Defeated
    California Proposition 25: Majority Legislative Vote to Pass Budget 2010 Opposed  Approveda Approved
    California Proposition 26: Two-Thirds Legislative Vote for Fees 2010 Supported  Approveda Approved
    California Proposition 1A: Tax and Spending Changes 2009 Opposed  Defeatedd Defeated
    California Proposition 1B: Supplemental Education Appropriations 2009 Opposed  Defeatedd Defeated
    California Proposition 1A: High-Speed Rail Bond 2008 Opposed  Approveda Approved
    California Proposition 83: Allows for Longer Terms in Office 2008 Opposed  Defeatedd Defeated
    California Proposition 98: Rules Governing Eminent Domain and Rent Control 2008 Supported  Defeatedd Defeated
    California Proposition 99: Rules Governing Eminent Domain 2008 Opposed  Approveda Approved
    California Proposition 81: Bonds for Libraries 2006 Opposed  Defeatedd Defeated
    California Proposition 88: Statewide $50 Parcel Tax 2006 Opposed  Defeatedd Defeated
    California Proposition 76: Cap on Growth of State Budget 2005 Supported  Defeatedd Defeated
    California Proposition 26: Decrease Voter Approval Requirement to Simple Majority for School Bonds 2000 Opposed  Defeatedd Defeated
    California Proposition 39: Decrease Voter Approval Requirement too 55 Percent for School Bonds 2000 Opposed  Approveda Approved
    California Proposition 218: Voter Approval of Local Tax Increases 1996 Supported  Approveda Approved
    California Proposition 136: State and Local Tax Limits 1990 Supported  Defeatedd Defeated
    California Proposition 137: Voter Approval of Initiative Process Changes 1990 Supported  Defeatedd Defeated
    California Proposition 62: Voter Approval of Local Taxes 1986 Supported  Approveda Approved
    California Proposition 7: Inflation-Adjusted Indexing of Income Tax Brackets 1982 Supported  Approveda Approved

    California Tax on Commercial and Industrial Properties Initiative (2020)

    See also: California Proposition 15, Tax on Commercial and Industrial Properties for Education and Local Government Funding Initiative (2020)

    The campaign Schools and Communities First qualified a ballot initiative for the election on November 3, 2020, that was designed to amend Proposition 13. The ballot initiative would require commercial and industrial properties, except those zoned as commercial agriculture, to be taxed based on their market value, rather than their purchase price, and allocate revenue from the change to local governments and school districts. HJTA opposed to the ballot initiative. Jon Coupal, president of HJTA, said, "This is yet another attack on the longstanding taxpayer protections in Prop. 13. Special interests continue to push for new and higher taxes to pay for their out-of-control pensions, which have already directed existing tax revenue away from classrooms and other state priorities."[10] Coupal also said, "If the business community loses its Prop. 13 protection, we’re [homeowners] next on the menu."[12]

    Notable endorsements

    See also: Ballotpedia: Our approach to covering endorsements

    This section displays endorsements this organization made in elections within Ballotpedia's coverage scope.

    Notable candidate endorsements by Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association
    EndorseeElectionStageOutcome
    Mike Garcia  source  (R) U.S. House California District 27 (2022) PrimaryWon General
    Notable ballot measure endorsements by Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association
    MeasurePositionOutcome
    California Pandemic Early Detection and Prevention Institute Initiative (2024)  source OpposeNot on the ballot
    California Proposition 13, School and College Facilities Bond (March 2020)  source OpposeDefeated
    California Proposition 15, Tax on Commercial and Industrial Properties for Education and Local Government Funding Initiative (2020)  source OpposeDefeated
    California Proposition 19, Property Tax Transfers, Exemptions, and Revenue for Wildfire Agencies and Counties Amendment (2020)  source OpposeApproved
    California Proposition 1, Behavioral Health Services Program and Bond Measure (March 2024)  source OpposeApproved
    California Proposition 21, Local Rent Control Initiative (2020)  source OpposeDefeated
    California Proposition 25, Replace Cash Bail with Risk Assessments Referendum (2020)  source OpposeDefeated
    California Proposition 26, Simple Majority Vote for Local School Bonds and Charter School Facilities Initiative (March 2000)  source OpposeDefeated
    California Proposition 2, Public Education Facilities Bond Measure (2024)  source OpposeApproved
    California Proposition 30, Tax on Income Above $2 Million for Zero-Emissions Vehicles and Wildfire Prevention Initiative (2022)  source OpposeDefeated
    California Proposition 32, $18 Minimum Wage Initiative (2024)  source OpposeDefeated
    California Proposition 33, Prohibit State Limitations on Local Rent Control Initiative (2024)  source OpposeDefeated
    California Proposition 34, Require Certain Participants in Medi-Cal Rx Program to Spend 98% of Revenues on Patient Care Initiative (2024)  source SupportApproved
    California Proposition 36, Drug and Theft Crime Penalties and Treatment-Mandated Felonies Initiative (2024)  source SupportApproved
    California Proposition 4, Parks, Environment, Energy, and Water Bond Measure (2024)  source OpposeApproved
    California Proposition 50, Use of Legislative Congressional Redistricting Map Amendment (2025)  source OpposeOn the ballot
    California Proposition 5, Lower Supermajority Requirement to 55% for Local Bond Measures to Fund Housing and Public Infrastructure Amendment (2024)  source OpposeDefeated
    California Proposition 6, Remove Involuntary Servitude as Punishment for Crime Amendment (2024)  source OpposeDefeated
    California Two-Thirds Legislative Vote and Voter Approval for New or Increased Taxes Initiative (2024)  source SupportNot on the ballot
    California Vote Requirements for Initiatives Requiring Supermajority Votes Amendment (2026)  source OpposeOn the ballot

    Affiliations

    Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Foundation

    As of 2025, the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association had a related 501(c)(3) organization, the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Foundation.[13]

    According to the HJTA's website, the HJTF "is the research, education and legal arm of the Jarvis organization. HJTF advances the interests of taxpayers in the courtroom. Given the high cost of litigation, an ordinary taxpayer is rarely in a position to challenge the validity of an illegal tax levy. In appropriate cases, HJTF provides legal representation without cost to other taxpayer advocacy organizations, homeowners and individual taxpayers where the precedence established confers a broad public benefit to other citizens."[13]

    HJTA-PAC

    As of 2025, the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association had a related PAC, the HJTA-PAC. According to the HJTA's website, the HJTA-PAC "primarily focuses on electing good pro-Proposition 13 candidates to the Assembly, state Senate and, occasionally, local offices. Candidates are screened through a questionnaire and interview with the goal of finding candidates who are taxpayer-friendly, fiscally responsible and dedicated to the principles of Proposition 13. Those who qualify are endorsed and HJTA-PAC publicizes the names of those who deserve the support of taxpayers. HJTA-PAC is nonpartisan and will consider candidates of any party affiliation if they meet pro-taxpayer standards."[14]

    Committees

    As of 2025, the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association had two related campaign committees: the “PROTECT PROPOSITION 13” and “NO NEW TAXES” committees. According to the HJTA's website, the two committees were "established by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association to support and oppose ballot measures that are of concern to taxpayers."[14]

    Finances

    The following is a breakdown of Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association's revenues and expenses from 2012 to 2024, according to filings with the Internal Revenue Service compiled by ProPublica.[15]

    Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association financial data 2012-2024
    Year Revenue Expenses
    2012 $6.5 million $5.8 million
    2013 $7.3 million $6.9 million
    2014 $6 million $5 million
    2015 $5.7 million $5 million
    2016 $6 million $5.8 million
    2017 $6 million $6.2 million
    2018 $5.9 million $6 million
    2019 $6.6 million $5.9 million
    2020 $6.8 million $5.9 million
    2021 $7.8 million $7.3 million
    2022 $6.8 million $6.6 million
    2023 $6.3 million $6.2 million
    2024 $7.3 million $7 million

    Tax status

    The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association is a 501(c)(4) tax-exempt nonprofit organization. Its 501(c) status refers to a section of the U.S. federal income tax code concerning social welfare organizations.[16] Organizations that have been granted 501(c)(4) status by the Internal Revenue Service are exempt from federal income tax.[17] Section 501(c) of the U.S. tax code has 29 sections listing specific conditions particular organizations must meet in order to be considered tax-exempt under the section. Unlike 501(c)(3) organizations, however, donations to 501(c)(4) organizations are not tax-deductible for the individual or corporation making the contribution. 501(c)(4) organizations may engage in political lobbying and political campaign activities. This includes donations to political committees that support or oppose ballot measures, bond issues, recalls, or referenda.

    See also: 501(c)(4) organizations on Ballotpedia

    Noteworthy events

    Proposition 15 (2020) ballot language lawsuit

    See also: California Proposition 15, Tax on Commercial and Industrial Properties for Education and Local Government Funding Initiative (2020)

    On July 29, 2020, Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association filed a lawsuit against California Attorney General Xavier Becerra "for his abject failure to produce impartial ballot material related to Proposition 15, the 'split roll' attack that seeks the partial repeal of Proposition 13." Jon Coupal, President of Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, said, "This blatant manipulation of the ballot label as well as the title and summary is in direct contravention of the Attorney General’s fiduciary duty to prepare impartial ballot material."[18]

    Recent news

    The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

    See also

    External links

    Footnotes

    1. 1.0 1.1 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, "About HJTA," accessed November 13, 2019
    2. Hoover Institute, "The Tax Revolt Turns 20," July 1, 1998
    3. Wall Stree Journal, "The Terms of Surrender in California’s Tax Revolt," October 26, 2016
    4. Reuters, "California's anti-tax crusaders talk revolt," April 7, 2009
    5. Los Angeles Times, "Can Proposition 13 survive California's new appetite for taxes?" November 17, 2016
    6. The Sacramento Bee, "After 40 years, Proposition 13 still protects California taxpayers," June 5, 2018
    7. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, "Jon Coupal," accessed November 13, 2019
    8. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, "The History of HJTA," accessed October 15, 2025
    9. ProPublica, "Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association," accessed October 15, 2025
    10. 10.0 10.1 California Business Roundtable, "Broad-Based Coalition Ready to Fight Billion-Dollar Split-Roll Tax Increase Initiative in 2020," August 14, 2018
    11. EdSource, "For better or worse, school construction bond on March 2020 ballot will be Prop. 13," November 7, 2019
    12. San Francisco Chronicle, "Big change in California’s Proposition 13 could be headed to ballot," August 21, 2018
    13. 13.0 13.1 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, "Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Foundation," accessed October 15, 2025
    14. 14.0 14.1 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Associatio, "PAC/Committees," accessed October 15, 2025
    15. ProPublica, "Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association," accessed October 15, 2025
    16. Internal Revenue Service, "Social Welfare Organizations," accessed January 14, 2014
    17. Internal Revenue Service, "IRC 501(c)(4) Organizations," accessed July 10, 2014
    18. HJTA, "(PR): HJTA FILES SUIT AGAINST ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR BALLOT MATERIAL DECEPTION," accessed August 8, 2020